Implementation of SORA Methodology Version 2.5 for Medical Delivery Using Quadrotor UAS in Remote Areas

Main Article Content

Rachmad Hidayat
Yazdi Ibrahim Jenie

Abstract

The innovative quadrotor Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) approach for delivery missions presents significant opportunities to address logistical distribution challenges (i.e. medical delivery) in remote areas. The efficiency of quadrotor UAS, which does not need additional infrastructure like runways, makes it increasingly applicable to remote regions. However, the potential implementation of UAS for medical delivery missions comes with considerable risks, such as collisions with manned aircraft or UAS crashes that could damage infrastructure and cause fatal injuries to human life. Therefore, in UAS operations, a method of operational risk assessment is needed to ensure safety, resilience, and operational success. The Joint Authorities for the Rulemaking of Unmanned Systems (JARUS) offers a risk assessment methodology named Specific Operational Risk Assessment (SORA) for UAS operations. The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the Indonesian Ministry of Transportation have recognised and approved this methodology as a risk assessment method for specific UAS categories. SORA provides a step-by-step framework in risk assessment to identify, evaluate, and determine necessary mitigation actions to achieve an acceptable means of compliance (MoC). EASA has announced using the latest version, SORA V2.5, planned for implementation in the fourth quarter of 2023. The Indonesian Ministry of Transportation also plans to adopt this latest version for UAS operations. Several updates and simplifications have been made to this version. Therefore, this paper presents the application of risk assessment using SORA V2.5 for medical delivery operations in remote areas using quadrotor UAS. The analysis in this paper covers each step of SORA V2.5, including risk identification and evaluation, as well as the implementation of mitigations in the conducted mission. The results indicate that SORA V2.5 can be implemented in this mission by taking appropriate mitigation actions to assure operational safety. There are also recommendations for optimising risk identification and it can complement the SORA methodology.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

M. Shafiee, Z. Zhou, L. Mei, F. Dinmohammadi, J. Karama, and D. Flynn, “Unmanned aerial drones for inspection of offshore wind turbines: A mission-critical failure analysis,” Robotics, vol. 10, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.3390/robotics10010026.

J. Koiwanit, “Analysis of environmental impacts of drone delivery on an online shopping system,” Advances in Climate Change Research, vol. 9, no. 3, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.accre.2018.09.001.

Jarus, UAS Operational Categorization. 2019. Accessed: Dec. 20, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://jarus-rpas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/jar_10_doc_UAS_Operational_Cat.pdf

European Union Aviation Safety Agency, “Easy Access Rules for Unmanned Aircraft Systems,” European Union Aviation Safety Agency. Accessed: Dec. 20, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/easy-access-rules/easy-access-rules-unmanned-aircraft-systems-regulations-eu

Jarus, JARUS guidelines on Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) Edition Number 2.0. Jarus, 2019. Accessed: Dec. 20, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://jarus-rpas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/jar_doc_06_jarus_sora_v2.0.pdf

Jarus, Draft For External Consultation: JARUS guidelines on Specific Operations Risk Assessment (SORA) Edition Number 2.5. 2022. Accessed: Dec. 20, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://jarus-rpas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/jar_doc_06_jarus_sora_v2.0.pdf

Kementerian Perhubungan, Peraturan Menteri Perhubungan Nomor 37 Tahun 2020 tentang Pengoperasian Pesawat Udara Tanpa Awak di Ruang Udara yang Dilayani Indonesia. Indonesia, 2020.

C. Martinez, P. J. Sanchez-Cuevas, S. Gerasimou, A. Bera, and M. A. Olivares-Mendez, “SORA Methodology for Multi-UAS Airframe Inspections in an Airport,” Drones, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 141, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/drones5040141.

C. Capitan, J. Capitan, A. R. Castano, and A. Ollero, “Risk Assessment based on SORA Methodology for a UAS Media Production Application,” in 2019 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), IEEE, Jun. 2019, pp. 451–459. doi: 10.1109/ICUAS.2019.8798211.

P.-C. Shao, “Risk Assessment for UAS Logistic Delivery under UAS Traffic Management Environment,” Aerospace, vol. 7, no. 10, p. 140, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.3390/aerospace7100140.

Press, “Involi – what is the impact of SORA 2.5 on your Operational Authorisation application?,” sUAS News,” Suas News: The Business of Drones.

Yazdi Ibrahim Jenie, Chandra Liuswanto, Mahesa Akbar, and Novyanto Widadi(, “Studi Prospektif Penggunaan Drone Kargo di Daerah Terdepan, Terpencil dan Tertinggal (3T) dan Terdampak Bencana,” Jurnal Warta Ardhia, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 95–110, 2022.

J. EUCHI, “Do drones have a realistic place in a pandemic fight for delivering medical supplies in healthcare systems problems?,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 34, no. 2. 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.06.006.

Skydrone Robotics, “Skydrone Robotics conception et fabrication de drones,” Skydrone Robotics. Accessed: Jul. 27, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://skydrone-robotics.com/en/

Victor Riou, “Versatyl : Le drone multi-missions modulaire de l’entreprise française Skydrone Robotics,” Air and Cosmos. Accessed: Dec. 21, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://air-cosmos.com/article/versatyl-le-drone-multi-missions-modulaire-de-l-entreprise-francaise-skydrone-robotics-65387

BPS Kabupaten Nias Selatan, Kabupaten Nias Selatan Dalam Angka 2023. Nias: BPS Kabupaten Nias Selatan, 2023.

IAA, Guidance for Dimensioning of Flight Geography, Contingency Volume and Ground Risk Buffer. IAA, 2023.

Jarus, Draft WG-SRM External Consultation: JARUS guidelines on SORA_Annex B_Integrity And Assurance Levels For The Mitigations Used To Reduce The Intrinsic Ground Risk Class. Jarus, 2022. Accessed: Dec. 21, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://jarus-rpas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/jar_doc_06_jarus_sora_v2.0.pdf

Jarus, JARUS guidelines on SORA_Annex C_ Strategic Mitigation Collision Risk Assessment. Edition Number 1.0. Jarus, 2019. Accessed: Dec. 21, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://jarus-rpas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/jar_doc_06_jarus_sora_annex_c_v1.0.pdf

Jarus, Draft WG-SRM External Consultation: JARUS guidelines on SORA_Annex E_ Integrity and Assurance Levels for the Operational Safety Objectives (OSO). Jarus, 2022. Accessed: Dec. 21, 2023. [Online]. Available: http://jarus-rpas.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/jar_doc_06_jarus_sora_annex_e_v1.0_.pdf